Kolet ink* – uniting global citizens through dialogue

Stop ripping on socialism

October 23, 2008 · 1 Comment

Hey! What’s so bad about socialism?

Lately, socialism has been getting a bad wrap and I want to know why. I live in France, a country that prides itself on the socialist system and I have to say, socialism rocks.

I have never had a better quality of life than I do here in France. I have housing support, full health and dental insurance for a very reasonable monthly price, and I can find a bottle of wine for less than two euros in the grocery store, even on Sundays. After all this overindulgence, I still have enough spending cash to jet off to London every few months. Oh, and by the way, I make the living wages of a 15 year old girl working at McDonald’s.

If I made my current French salary in America, I would probably have to live in my childhood bedroom in my parents’ house for the next four years to get out of the hole, paying them 100 bucks a month so they wouldn’t have to watch me rot on the street. With no health or dental insurance, I would have blown what little savings I had by now on x-rays and root canals. And believe me, these scenarios aren’t exactly hypothetical. Or really, at all.

Last week, in the dreaded “Joe the Plumber” incident, Obama got burned at the stake for alluding to the fact that redistributing the wealth in America might be a good idea. He dared to admit that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer and that he wants the vicious cycle to stop. How can anyone chastise him for that?

Well, I, the big socialist, certainly will not. It’s true that France’s economy is in the toilet. Even though no French person I have come across actually thinks the financial crisis will ever affect them, they’re going to feel the heat eventually. Or maybe they’ve already had their turn at economic turbulence. How else do you explain that, like me, every journalist I know makes around 7.50 euros an hour after taxes, even those with bachelor’s or master’s degrees? Sure, we get benefits from the overly generous governmental welfare system, but in exchange, that same government gets stingy come tax time. France, like Belgium and Germany, pays some of the highest taxes in Europe – around 50% from their employment check each month. However, the benefits may outweigh the burden in terms of care.

In January 2008, the Census Bureau announced that 47 million Americans were living without health insurance. That’s 47 million. First of all, trying to imagine that number of people is unfathomable. Secondly, how did we let things get this way? And how can we turn it around? Certainly not with some socialist system where the government pays for everyone’s health care like they do it here in Europe, oh no! Because, as we’ve already mentioned, socialism is scary… almost as bad as communism in the eyes of some uninformed vice-presidential candidates.

I don’t know that, even if Obama intended to lay out a health care system similar to that of Europe, it would work. Americans are die-hard capitalists and want to do it their way and for themselves. There’s no sense of helping out your neighbor, or letting your neighbor help you once in awhile. And this from a country where anyone and everyone can volunteer, as opposed to France where you practically have to get your fingerprints taken to help out at the local animal shelter.

Before we put socialism behind bars with the commies, let’s first figure out what the heck we’re talking about. One of the tenets of socialism is creating a society where there is an equal distribution of wealth and power – virtually the opposite of capitalism, where people are encouraged to make as much bank as humanly possible. Part of socialism is making sure the rich don’t get too rich and the poor don’t fall too far down the economic ladder.

With this in mind, Americans need to recognize that helping a country’s vulnerable population is the job of each country and, subsequently, each country’s government. A country doesn’t function without some type of support or aide, and the only confusion should be to what extent a government gets involved, not if it should be done at all. And just so we’re clear, in order to receive benefits, you’ve got to pay taxes. There’s no such thing as free health care – it just seems free here in Europe when your money is taken out before you even open your paycheck.

In the end, many critics would argue that the socialism European countries employ has developed into a very loose definition of the word. And even if it does still exist in its original form, maybe it’s not the answer to America’s problems. But it wouldn’t be a bad idea to take some advice from the Europeans for once. After all, by the looks of the financial crisis, it sounds like they’ll soon be running the show.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

1 response so far ↓

  • Steve // November 10, 2008 at 3:42 am

    I agree firstly that socialism has gotten a bad rap throughout the previous century due to its close ties to communism and the Evil Empire (who just loaned Iceland enough cash to keep its banking system going recently-apparently they’ve discovered how to navigate in waters of all sorts!). Now I think the “fear” in socialism is in a modern anti-Europe (or even an anti-Old World) mindset that has stemmed from the events of the turbulent Bush II era, which I’m more than happy to put an end to, which include anti-American sentiments on the other side of the Atlantic and the rise of leftist governments in South America, where vast resources and commercial interests lie.
    Secondly the American Way of doing your best and making your own way has been a point of pride throughout our short history. And there are two schools of thought on my next point (my view and someone’s bold refutation of it, i hope!): capitalism opposes socialism because it changes the system from individual focus to a collective focus. Do we trust a big (and growing) government to turn on a dime and deliver effective results using new methodology after 40 years of blatant plutocracy and a seeming steady march into a sort of government that the Founding Fathers hoped would never occur? Ask the guy who had his retirement wiped out on Wall Street because of the greed and short-sightedness of a few hundred people he’ll never get to ask “Why?” Could he trust a distant group of people to make sure all he’s worked for wouldn’t disappear and be “redistributed” to someone who hadn’t worked for it? Or who lacked the capacity to “earn his keep”? The phrase “each according to his abilities and means” comes to mind.
    Of course, the new element in the socialist-capitalist debate is globalism. By and large, we humans rely more on one another than at any point in history. And we share more problems than ever before.
    In short, the goal should not be a debate on “the system” rather the goal should be to figure out ways to become more effective individuals and how to work together better.
    Thats something no government or religion will ever be able to do, and the sooner humans forget the delusion that god or guv’nor is gonna fix this mess, then the sooner this world will see true progress and enlightenment instead of the steady march toward extinction and cyclical failure of modern civilizations.
    Either that or we could colonize Mars. That would buy us time for more debate on this issue and just think of the untapped market in advertising on an entire different celestial body.
    On second thought, if they can get rid of commercials, let me have my high taxes and free health care.

Leave a Comment